Visual Prosthesis

ABSTRACT

A method to provide visual current feedback of a retinal stimulation system. The method comprising: providing a retinal stimulation system configured to stimulate neural tissue in a subject&#39;s eye, the retinal stimulation system comprising: an electronics package; and at least a first and a second electrode, each associated with the electronics package and configured to apply current to a subject&#39;s retina; wherein current to be applied by the first electrode and the second electrode is configured to be higher for the first electrode when the first electrode has an impedance lower than a second electrode&#39;s impedance; and providing a visual interface configured to show impedance of at least one of the electrodes.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional PatentApplication Ser. No. 60/853,477, filed Oct. 20, 2006 for “Real TimeElectrode Impedance Measurement and Data Display for an ImplantableDevice” by Robert J. Greenberg, Mark S. Humayun, Kelly H. McClure andMatthew J. McMahon, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein byreference.

FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT

The present invention was made with support from the United StatesGovernment under Grant number R24EY12893-01, awarded by the NationalInstitutes of Health. The United States Government has certain rights inthe invention.

FIELD

The present disclosure relates to visual prostheses configured toprovide neutral stimulation for the creation of artificial vision.

BACKGROUND

In 1755 LeRoy passed the discharge of a Leyden jar through the orbit ofa man who was blind from cataract and the patient saw “flames passingrapidly downwards.” Ever since, there has been a fascination withelectrically elicited visual perception. The general concept ofelectrical stimulation of retinal cells to produce these flashes oflight or phosphenes has been known for quite some time. Based on thesegeneral principles, some early attempts at devising a prosthesis foraiding the visually impaired have included attaching electrodes to thehead or eyelids of patients. While some of these early attempts met withsome limited success, these early prosthetic devices were large, bulkyand could not produce adequate simulated vision to truly aid thevisually impaired.

In the early 1930's, Foerster investigated the effect of electricallystimulating the exposed occipital pole of one cerebral hemisphere. Hefound that, when a point at the extreme occipital pole was stimulated,the patient perceived a small spot of light directly in front andmotionless (a phosphene). Subsequently, Brindley and Lewin (1968)thoroughly studied electrical stimulation of the human occipital(visual) cortex. By varying the stimulation parameters, theseinvestigators described in detail the location of the phosphenesproduced relative to the specific region of the occipital cortexstimulated. These experiments demonstrated: (1) the consistent shape andposition of phosphenes; (2) that increased stimulation pulse durationmade phosphenes brighter; and (3) that there was no detectableinteraction between neighboring electrodes which were as close as 2.4 mmapart.

As intraocular surgical techniques have advanced, it has become possibleto apply stimulation on small groups and even on individual retinalcells to generate focused phosphenes through devices implanted withinthe eye itself. This has sparked renewed interest in developing methodsand apparatuses to aid the visually impaired. Specifically, great efforthas been expended in the area of intraocular visual prosthesis devicesin an effort to restore vision in cases where blindness is caused byphotoreceptor degenerative retinal diseases such as retinitis pigmentosaand age related macular degeneration which affect millions of peopleworldwide.

Neural tissue can be artificially stimulated and activated by prostheticdevices that pass pulses of electrical current through electrodes onsuch a device. The passage of current causes changes in electricalpotentials across visual neuronal membranes, which can initiate visualneuron action potentials, which are the means of information transfer inthe nervous system.

Based on this mechanism, it is possible to input information into thenervous system by coding the information as a sequence of electricalpulses which are relayed to the nervous system via the prostheticdevice. In this way, it is possible to provide artificial sensationsincluding vision.

One typical application of neural tissue stimulation is in therehabilitation of the blind. Some forms of blindness involve selectiveloss of the light sensitive transducers of the retina. Other retinalneurons remain viable, however, and may be activated in the mannerdescribed above by placement of a prosthetic electrode device on theinner (toward the vitreous) retinal surface (epiretial). This placementmust be mechanically stable, minimize the distance between the deviceelectrodes and the visual neurons, and avoid undue compression of thevisual neurons.

In 1986, Bullara (U.S. Pat. No. 4,573,481) patented an electrodeassembly for surgical implantation on a nerve. The matrix was siliconewith embedded iridium electrodes. The assembly fit around a nerve tostimulate it.

Dawson and Radtke stimulated cat's retina by direct electricalstimulation of the retinal ganglion cell layer. These experimentersplaced nine and then fourteen electrodes upon the inner retinal layer(i.e., primarily the ganglion cell layer) of two cats. Their experimentssuggested that electrical stimulation of the retina with 30 to 100 uAcurrent resulted in visual cortical responses. These experiments werecarried out with needle-shaped electrodes that penetrated the surface ofthe retina (see also U.S. Pat. No. 4,628,933 to Michelson).

The Michelson '933 apparatus includes an array of photosensitive deviceson its surface that are connected to a plurality of electrodespositioned on the opposite surface of the device to stimulate theretina. These electrodes are disposed to form an array similar to a “bedof nails” having conductors which impinge directly on the retina tostimulate the retinal cells. U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,049 to Byers describesspike electrodes for neural stimulation. Each spike electrode piercesneural tissue for better electrical contact. U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,088 toNorman describes an array of spike electrodes for cortical stimulation.Each spike pierces cortical tissue for better electrical contact.

The art of implanting an intraocular prosthetic device to electricallystimulate the retina was advanced with the introduction of retinal tacksin retinal surgery. De Juan, et al. at Duke University Eye Centerinserted retinal tacks into retinas in an effort to reattach retinasthat had detached from the underlying choroid, which is the source ofblood supply for the outer retina and thus the photoreceptors. See,e.g., E. de Juan, et al., 99 Am. J. Opthalmol. 272 (1985). These retinaltacks have proved to be biocompatible and remain embedded in the retina,and choroid/sclera, effectively pinning the retina against the choroidand the posterior aspects of the globe. Retinal tacks are one way toattach a retinal array to the retina. U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,844 to de Juandescribes a flat electrode array placed against the retina for visualstimulation. U.S. Pat. No. 5,935,155 to Humayun describes a visualprosthesis for use with the flat retinal array described in de Juan.

SUMMARY

According to a first aspect, a method for stimulating a subject's retinais disclosed, the method comprising: selecting at least a first and asecond electrode each configured to apply current to a subject's retina;determining impedance for the at least first electrode and secondelectrode; and applying current to the subject's retina through the atleast first and second electrode, wherein current to be applied by thefirst electrode and the second electrode is configured to be higher forthe first electrode when the first electrode has an impedance lower thana second electrode's impedance.

According to a second aspect, a method for implanting electrodes in asubject's retina is disclosed, the method comprising: a) temporarilyplacing electrodes in a subject's retina; b) determining impedance ofthe placed electrodes; and c) repeating features a) and b) untilimpedance of the electrodes is ideal for permanent implanting of theelectrodes.

According to a third aspect, a method for applying current to a load isdisclosed, the method comprising selecting a first and a secondelectrode each configured to apply current to a load; determiningimpedance of the electrodes; and applying current to the load throughthe first and second electrode, wherein current to be applied by thefirst electrode and the second electrode is configured to be higher forthe first electrode when the first electrode has an impedance lower thana second electrode's impedance.

According to a fourth aspect, a method for stimulating a subject'sretina is disclosed, the method comprising selecting at least a firstand a second electrode, each configured to apply current to a subject'sretina; and applying current to the subject's retina through the firstand second electrode, wherein current to be applied by the firstelectrode and the second electrode is configured to be higher for thefirst electrode when the first electrode is disposed farther from thesubject's retina than the second electrode.

According to a fifth aspect, a method for determining which electrode isto be in contact with a subject's retina is disclosed, the methodcomprising: applying current to a plurality of electrodes implanted inthe subject's eye; and determining impedance of each electrode of theplurality of electrodes, establishing the electrode with the highestimpedance as the electrode in contact with the subject's retina.

According to a sixth aspect, a method to provide visual current feedbackof a retinal stimulation system is disclosed, the method comprising:providing a retinal stimulation system configured to stimulate neuraltissue in a subject's eye, the retinal stimulation system comprising: anelectronics package; and at least a first and a second electrode, eachassociated with the electronics package and configured to apply currentto a subject's retina; wherein current to be applied by the firstelectrode and the second electrode is configured to be higher for thefirst electrode when the first electrode has an impedance lower than asecond electrode's impedance; and providing a visual interfaceconfigured to show impedance of at least one of the electrodes.

According to a seventh aspect, a method for providing visual currentfeedback when implanting electrodes in a subject's retina, is disclosed,the method comprising: a) temporarily placing electrodes in a subject'sretina; b) determining impedance of the placed electrodes; c) monitoringimpedance of at least one of the electrodes using a visual interface; d)repeating features a) and c) until impedance of the electrodes is idealfor permanent implanting of the electrodes.

According to an eight aspect, a computer-operated system comprising adisplay component, the display component having a graphical userinterface associated with the method for implanting electrodes in asubject's retina is disclosed, the method comprising: a) placingelectrodes in a subject's retina; b) determining impedance of the placedelectrodes; c) repeating features a) and b) until impedance of theelectrodes is ideal for implanting of the electrodes; and the graphicaluser interface comprising: a diagnostic module screen; and a measureimpedance button.

According to a ninth aspect, a computer implemented method for testingimpedance of electrodes is disclosed, the method comprising: a) settinga counter to an initial value; b) incrementing the value of the counter;c) stimulating an electrode that corresponds to the value of thecounter; d) measuring a voltage drop across the stimulated electrode;and e) repeating features b) through d) until the value of the counterreflects the total number of electrodes being tested.

According to a tenth aspect, a method to provide visual current feedbackwhen determining which electrode is to be in contact with a subject'sretina is disclosed, the method comprising: applying current to aplurality of electrodes implanted in the subject's eye; determiningimpedance of each electrode of the plurality of electrodes; providing avisual interface configured to show impedance of at least one of theelectrodes; and establishing the electrode with the highest impedance asthe electrode in contact with the subject's retina.

According to an eleventh aspect, a retinal stimulation system configuredto stimulate neural tissue in a subject's eye is disclosed, the retinalstimulation system comprising: an electronics package; and at least afirst and a second electrode, each associated with the electronicspackage and configured to apply current to a subject's retina; whereincurrent to be applied by the first electrode and the second electrode isconfigured to be higher for the first electrode when the first electrodehas an impedance lower than a second electrode's impedance.

According to a twelfth aspect, a device configured to apply current to aload is disclosed, the device comprising: a current source; and at leasta first and a second electrode each associated with the current sourceand configured to apply current to a load; wherein current to be appliedby the first electrode and the second electrode is configured to behigher for the first electrode when the first electrode has an impedancelower than a second electrode's impedance.

According to a thirteenth aspect, a retinal stimulation systemconfigured to stimulate retina's neural tissue in a subject's eye isdisclosed, the retinal stimulation system comprising: an electronicspackage; and at least a first and a second electrode each associatedwith the electronics package and configured to apply current to asubject's retina; wherein current to be applied by the first electrodeand the second electrode is configured to be higher for the firstelectrode when the first electrode is disposed farther from a retinathan the second electrode.

Further embodiments are shown in the specification, drawings and claimsof the present application.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

FIG. 1 shows a visual prosthesis apparatus according to the presentdisclosure.

FIGS. 2 and 3 show a retinal stimulation system adapted to be implantedinto a subject.

FIG. 4 shows a front view of the implanted retinal stimulation system.

FIG. 5 shows a side view of the implanted system of FIG. 9.

FIGS. 6 and 7 show a video capture/transmission apparatus or visoradapted to be used in combination with the retinal stimulation system ofFIGS. 2-5.

FIG. 8 shows a flexible circuit electrode array, also shown in FIG. 2.

FIG. 9 shows components of a fitting system according to the presentdisclosure, the system also comprising the visor shown in FIGS. 6-7.

FIG. 10 shows the visual prosthesis apparatus in a stand-alone mode,i.e. comprising the visor of FIGS. 6-7 connected to a video processingunit.

FIGS. 11-12 show the video processing unit already briefly shown withreference to FIGS. 9-10.

FIGS. 13-1, 13-2, 13-3 and 13-4 show an exemplary embodiment of a videoprocessing unit. FIG. 13-1 should be viewed at the left of FIG. 13-2.FIG. 13-3 should be viewed at the left of FIG. 13-4. FIGS. 13-1 and 13-2should be viewed on top of FIGS. 13-3 and 13-4.

FIG. 14 shows a Main Menu computer screen.

FIG. 15 shows a Login computer screen.

FIG. 16 shows an ‘Electrode Integrity’ message box.

FIG. 17 shows a diagnostics computer screen.

FIG. 18 shows a ‘Measuring Impedance’ message box.

FIG. 19 shows a computer screen indicating impedance values.

FIGS. 20 and 21 show waveform computer screens.

FIG. 22 shows flow chart of the testing procedure.

In the following description, like reference numbers are used toidentify like elements. Furthermore, the drawings are intended toillustrate major features of exemplary embodiments in a diagrammaticmanner. The drawings are not intended to depict every feature of everyimplementation nor relative dimensions of the depicted elements, and arenot drawn to scale.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The present disclosure is concerned with a visual apparatus and a methodfor creation of artificial vision. In particular, the present disclosureprovides an interface and method for controlling a visual prosthesis(i.e. device) implanted in an individual patient (i.e. subject) tocreate artificial vision.

FIG. 1 shows a visual prosthesis apparatus. The visual apparatuscomprises, in combination, an implantable retinal stimulation system 1and a video capture/transmission apparatus or visor embodied invisor/Glasses 5. An exemplary retinal stimulation system 1 is shown inmore detail in FIGS. 2-5 and an exemplary visor 5 is shown in moredetail in FIGS. 6 and 7.

The retinal stimulation system 1 is further disclosed in U.S.application Ser. No. 11/207,644, filed Aug. 19, 2005 for “FlexibleCircuit Electrode Array” by Robert J. Greenberg, et, al. incorporatedherein by reference, and is intended for use in subjects with retinitispigmentosa. The visor 5 is further disclosed in International PatentApplication No. PCT/US07/13918, (Applicant's Docket No. S416-PCT) filedon Jun. 14, 2007 and entitled “APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ELECTRICALSTIMULATION OF HUMAN RETINA,” also incorporated herein by reference.

□

The exemplary retinal stimulation system 1, shown in FIGS. 2 and 3, isan implantable electronic device containing an inductive coil 116 and anelectrode array 2 that is electrically coupled by a cable 3 that piercessclera of the subject's eye to an electronics package 4, external to thesclera. The retinal stimulation system 1 is designed, for example, toelicit visual percepts in blind subjects with retinitis pigmentosa.

Human vision provides a field of view that is wider than it is high.This is partially due to fact that we have two eyes, but even a singleeye provides a field of view that is approximately 90° high and 140° to160° degrees wide. It is therefore, advantageous to provide a flexiblecircuit electrode array 2 that is wider than it is tall. This is equallyapplicable to a cortical visual array. In which case, the widerdimension is not horizontal on the visual cortex, but corresponds tohorizontal in the visual scene.

FIG. 8 shows the flexible circuit electrode array 2 prior to folding andattaching to the electronics package 4 of FIG. 2. At one end of theflexible circuit cable 3 is an interconnection pad 52 for connection tothe electronics package 4. At the other end of the flexible circuitcable 3 is the flexible circuit electrode array 2. Further, anattachment point 54 may be provided near the flexible circuit electrodearray 2. A retina tack (not shown) is placed through the attachmentpoint 54 to hold the flexible circuit electrode array 2 to the retina. Astress relief 57 may be provided surrounding the attachment point 54.The stress relief 57 may be made of a softer polymer than the flexiblecircuit, or it may include cutouts or thinning of the polymer to reducethe stress transmitted from the retina tack to the flexible circuitelectrode array 2. The flexible circuit cable 3 may be formed in a dogleg pattern so than when it is folded at fold 48 it effectively forms astraight flexible circuit cable 3 with a narrower portion at the fold 48for passing through the sclerotomy. The electrode array 2 may comprise apolyimide cable that houses wire conductors and an array of exposedplatinum electrodes in a grid. In one embodiment, there are sixtyelectrodes arranged in a 6×10 grid.

The electronics package 4 of FIGS. 2 and 3 can be electrically coupledto the inductive coil 116. In one aspect, the inductive coil 116contains a receiver and transmitter antennae made from wound wire.Alternatively, the inductive coil 116 may be made from a thin filmpolymer sandwich with wire traces deposited between layers of thin filmpolymer. The electronics package 4 may contain components and anApplication Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC) for processing thereceived data and using the received power to generate the requiredstimulation output. The electronics package 4 and the inductive coil 116may be held together by a molded body 118 shown in FIG. 3. As also shownin FIG. 3, the molded body 118 may also include suture tabs 120 shown inFIG. 3. The molded body narrows to form a strap 122 which surrounds thesclera and holds the molded body 118, inductive coil 116, andelectronics package 4 in place. The molded body 118, suture tabs 120 andstrap 122 are preferably an integrated unit made of silicone elastomer.Silicone elastomer can be formed in a pre-curved shape to match thecurvature of a typical sclera. Furthermore, silicone remains flexibleenough to accommodate implantation and to adapt to variations in thecurvature of an individual sclera. In one aspect, the inductive coil 116and molded body 118 are oval shaped, and in this way, a strap 122 canbetter support the oval shaped coil.

The eye moves constantly. The eye moves to scan a scene and also has ajitter motion to prevent image stabilization. Even though such motion isuseless in the blind, it often continues long after a person has losttheir sight. Thus, in one embodiment of the present disclosure, theentire retinal stimulation system 1 of the prosthesis is attached to andsupported by the sclera of a subject. By placing the device under therectus muscles with the electronics package in an area of fatty tissuebetween the rectus muscles, eye motion does not cause any flexing whichmight fatigue, and eventually damage, the device.

FIG. 3 shows a side view of the retinal stimulation system 1, inparticular, emphasizing the fan tail 124. When the retinal prosthesis isimplanted, the strap 122 is passed under the eye muscles to surround thesclera. The inductive coil 116 and molded body 118 should also followthe strap under the lateral rectus muscle on the side of the sclera. Theretinal stimulation system 1 of the visual prosthesis apparatus is verydelicate. It is easy to tear the molded body 118 or break wires in theinductive coil 116. In order to allow the molded body 118 to slidesmoothly under the lateral rectus muscle, the molded body is shaped inthe form of a fan tail 124 on the end opposite the electronics package4. Element 123 shows a retention sleeve, while elements 126 and 128 showholes for surgical positioning and a ramp for surgical positioning,respectively.

FIGS. 4 and 5 show front and side views of the Retinal stimulationsystem 1 implanted with respect to the subject's eye 7. As shown inFIGS. 4 and 5, the electrode array 2 enters the eye through a pars planaincision and is placed on the retina over the fovea using a retinaltack. The remaining Retinal stimulation system 1 is secured to the eyeby means of a scleral band held in place by a Watzke sleeve (typical ofscleral procedures), and also by suture tabs. Additionally, anothersuture may be placed around the scleral band in the inferior medicalquadrant of the eye.

Referring to FIGS. 6 and 7, the glasses 5 may comprise, for example, aframe 11 holding a camera 12, an external coil 14 and a mounting system16 for the external coil 14. The mounting system 16 may also enclose theRF circuitry. In this configuration, the video camera 12 captures livevideo. The video signal is sent to an external Video Processing Unit(VPU) 20 (shown in FIGS. 9-12 and discussed below), which processes thevideo signal and subsequently transforms the processed video signal intoelectrical stimulation patterns or data. The electrical stimulation dataare then sent to the external coil 14 that sends both data and power viaradio-frequency (RF) telemetry to the coil 116 of the retinalstimulation system 1, shown in FIGS. 2 and 3. The coil 116 receives theRF commands which control the application specific integrated circuit(ASIC) which in turn delivers stimulation to the retina of the subjectvia a thin film electrode array (TFEA). In one aspect of an embodiment,light amplitude is recorded by the camera 12. The VPU 20 may use alogarithmic encoding scheme to convert the incoming light amplitudesinto the electrical stimulation patterns or data. These electricalstimulation patterns or data may then be passed on to the RetinalStimulation System 1, which results in the retinal cells beingstimulated via the electrodes in the electrode array 2 (shown in FIGS.2, 3 and 8). In one exemplary embodiment, the electrical stimulationpatterns or data being transmitted by the external coil 14 is binarydata. The external coil 14 may contain a receiver and transmitterantennae and a radio-frequency (RF) electronics card for communicatingwith the internal coil 116.

Referring to FIG. 9, a Fitting System (FS) may be used to configure andoptimize the visual prosthesis apparatus shown in FIG. 1. The FittingSystem is fully described in the related application U.S. applicationSer. No. 11/796,425, filed on Apr. 27, 2007, (Applicant's Docket No.S401-USA) which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The Fitting System may comprise custom software with a graphical userinterface running on a dedicated laptop computer 10. Within the FittingSystem are modules for performing diagnostic checks of the implant,loading and executing video configuration files, viewing electrodevoltage waveforms, and aiding in conducting psychophysical experiments.A video module can be used to download a video configuration file to theVideo Processing Unit (VPU) 20 discussed above and store it innon-volatile memory to control various aspects of video configuration,e.g. the spatial relationship between the video input and theelectrodes. The software can also load a previously used videoconfiguration file from the VPU 20 for adjustment.

The Fitting System can be connected to the Psychophysical Test System(PTS), located for example on a dedicated laptop 30, in order to nmpsychophysical experiments. In psychophysics mode, the Fitting Systemenables individual electrode control, permitting clinicians to constructtest stimuli with control over current amplitude, pulse-width, andfrequency of the stimulation. In addition, the psychophysics moduleallows the clinician to record subject responses. The PTS may include acollection of standard psychophysics experiments developed using forexample MATLAB (MathWorks) software and other tools to allow theclinicians to develop customized psychophysics experiment scripts.

Using the psychophysics module, important perceptual parameters such asperceptual threshold, maximum comfort level, and spatial location ofpercepts may be reliably measured. Based on these perceptual parameters,the fitting software enables custom configuration of the transformationbetween video image and spatio-temporal electrode stimulation parametersin an effort to optimize the effectiveness of the retinal prosthesis foreach subject.

The Fitting System laptop 10 of FIG. 9 may be connected to the VPU 20using an optically isolated serial connection adapter 40. Because it isoptically isolated, the serial connection adapter 40 assures that noelectric leakage current can flow from the Fitting System laptop 10 inthe even of a fault condition.

As shown in FIG. 9, the following components may be used with theFitting System according to the present disclosure. The Video ProcessingUnit (VPU) 20 for the subject being tested, a Charged Battery 25 for VPU20, the Glasses 5, a Fitting System (FS) Laptop 10, a PsychophysicalTest System (PTS) Laptop 30, a PTS CD (not shown), a CommunicationAdapter (CA) 40, a USB Drive (Security) (not shown), a USB Drive(Transfer) 47, a USB Drive (Video Settings) (not shown), a Patient InputDevice (RF Tablet) 50, a further Patient Input Device (Jog Dial) 55,Glasses Cable 15, CA-VPU Cable 70, FS-CA Cable 45, FS-PTS Cable 46, Four(4) Port USB Hub 47, Mouse 60, Test Array system 80, Archival USB Drive49, an Isolation Transformer (not shown), adapter cables (not shown),and an External Monitor (not shown).

With continued reference to FIG. 9, the external components of theFitting System may be configured as follows. The battery 25 is connectedwith the VPU 20. The PTS Laptop 30 is connected to FS Laptop 10 usingthe FS-PTS Cable 46. The PTS Laptop 30 and FS Laptop 10 are plugged intothe Isolation Transformer (not shown) using the Adapter Cables (notshown). The Isolation Transformer is plugged into the wall outlet. Thefour (4) Port USB Hub 47 is connected to the FS laptop 10 at the USBport. The mouse 60 and the two Patient Input Devices 50 and 55 areconnected to four (4) Port USB Hubs 47. The FS laptop 10 is connected tothe Communication Adapter (CA) 40 using the FS-CA Cable 45. The CA 40 isconnected to the VPU 20 using the CA-VPU Cable 70. The Glasses 5 areconnected to the VPU 20 using the Glasses Cable 15.

In one exemplary embodiment, the Fitting System shown in FIG. 9 may beused to configure system stimulation parameters and video processingstrategies for each subject outfitted with the visual prosthesisapparatus of FIG. 1. The fitting application, operating system, laptops10 and 30, isolation unit and VPU 20 may be tested and configurationcontrolled as a system. The software provides modules for electrodecontrol, allowing an interactive construction of test stimuli withcontrol over amplitude, pulse width, and frequency of the stimulationwaveform of each electrode in the Retinal stimulation system 1. Theseparameters are checked to ensure that maximum charge per phase limits,charge balance, and power limitations are met before the test stimuliare presented to the subject. Additionally, these parameters may bechecked a second time by the VPU 20's firmware. The Fitting System shownin FIG. 7 may also provide a psychophysics module for administering aseries of previously determined test stimuli to record subject'sresponses. These responses may be indicated by a keypad 50 and orverbally. The psychophysics module may also be used to reliably measureperceptual parameters such as perceptual threshold, maximum comfortlevel, and spatial location of percepts. These perceptual parameters maybe used to custom configure the transformation between the video imageand spatio-tempral electrode stimulation parameters thereby optimizingthe effectiveness of the visual prosthesis for each subject. The FittingSystem is fully described in the related application U.S. applicationSer. No. 11/796,425, filed on Apr. 27, 2007, (Applicant's Docket No.S401-USA) which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

The visual prosthesis apparatus of FIG. 1 may operate in two modes: i)stand-alone mode and ii) communication mode

Stand-Alone Mode

Referring to FIGS. 1, 2 and 10, in the stand-alone mode, the videocamera 12, on the glasses 5, captures a video image that is sent to theVPU 20. The VPU 20 processes the image from the camera 12 and transformsit into electrical stimulation patterns that are transmitted to theexternal coil 14. The external coil 14 sends the electrical stimulationpatterns and power via radio-frequency (RF) telemetry to the implantedretinal stimulation system 1 (FIGS. 2 and 3). The internal coil 116 ofthe retinal stimulation system 1 receives the RF commands from theexternal coil 14 and transmits them to the electronics package 4 that inturn delivers stimulation to the retina via the electrode array 2.Additionally, the retinal stimulation system 1 may communicate safetyand operational status back to the VPU 20 by transmitting RF telemetryfrom the internal coil 116 to the external coil 14. The visualprosthesis apparatus of FIG. 1 may be configured to electricallyactivate the retinal stimulation system 1 only when it is powered by theVPU 20 through the external coil 14. The stand-alone mode may be usedfor clinical testing and/or at-home use by the subject.

Communication Mode

The communication mode may be used for diagnostic testing,psychophysical testing, patient fitting and downloading of stimulationsettings to the VPU 20 before transmitting data from the VPU 20 to theretinal stimulation system 1 as is done for example in the stand-alonemode described above. Referring to FIG. 9, in the communication mode,the VPU 20 is connected to the Fitting System laptop 10 using cables 70,45 and the optically isolated serial connection adapter 40. In thismode, laptop 10 generated stimuli may be presented to the subject andprogramming parameters may be adjusted and downloaded to the VPU 20. ThePsychophysical Test System (PTS) laptop 30 connected to the FittingSystem laptop 10 may also be utilized to perform more sophisticatedtesting and analysis as fully described in the related application U.S.application Ser. No. 11/796,425, filed on Apr. 27, 2007, (Applicant'sDocket No. S401-USA) which is incorporated herein by reference in itsentirety.

In one embodiment, the functionality of the retinal stimulation system 1can also be tested pre-operatively and intra-operatively (i.e. beforeoperation and during operation) by using an external coil 14, withoutthe glasses 5, placed in close proximity to the retinal stimulationsystem 1. The coil 14 may communicate the status of the retinalstimulation system 1 to the VPU 20 that is connected to the FittingSystem laptop 10 as shown in FIG. 9.

As discussed above, the VPU 20 processes the image from the camera 12and transforms the image into electrical stimulation patterns for theretinal stimulation system 1. Filters such as edge detection filters maybe applied to the electrical stimulation patterns for example by the VPU20 to generate, for example, a stimulation pattern based on filteredvideo data that the VPU 20 turns into stimulation data for the retinalstimulation system 1. The images may then be reduced in resolution usinga downscaling filter. In one exemplary embodiment, the resolution of theimage may be reduced to match the number of electrodes in the electrodearray 2 of the retinal stimulation system 1. That is, if the electrodearray has, for example, sixty electrodes, the image may be reduced to asixty channel resolution. After the reduction in resolution, the imageis mapped to stimulation intensity using for example a look-up tablethat has been derived from testing of individual subjects. Then, the VPU20 transmits the stimulation parameters via forward telemetry to theretinal stimulation system 1 in frames that may employ a cyclicredundancy check (CRC) error detection scheme.

In one exemplary embodiment, the VPU 20 may be configured to allow thesubject/patient i) to turn the visual prosthesis apparatus on and off,ii) to manually adjust settings, and iii) to provide power and data tothe retinal stimulation system 1. Referring to FIGS. 11 and 12, the VPU20 may comprise a case 800, power button 805 for turning the VPU 20 onand off, setting button 810, zoom buttons 820 for controlling the camera12, connector port 815 for connecting to the Glasses 5, a connector port816 for connecting to the laptop 10 through the connection adapter 40,indicator lights 825 to give visual indication of operating status ofthe system, the rechargeable battery 25 for powering the VPU 20, batterylatch 830 for locking the battery 25 in the case 800, digital circuitboards (not shown), and a speaker (not shown) to provide audible alertsto indicate various operational conditions of the system. Because theVPU 20 is used and operated by a person with minimal or no vision, thebuttons on the VPU 20 may be differently shaped and/or have specialmarkings as shown in FIG. 12 to help the user identify the functionalityof the button without having to look at it. As shown in FIG. 12, thepower button 805 may be a circular shape while the settings button 820may be square shape and the zoom buttons 820 may have special raisedmarkings 830 to also identify each buttons functionality. One skilled inthe art would appreciate that other shapes and markings can be used toidentify the buttons without departing from the spirit and scope of theinvention. For example, the markings can be recessed instead of raised.

In one embodiment, the indicator lights 825 may indicate that the VPU 20is going through system start-up diagnostic testing when the one or moreindicator lights 825 are blinking fast (more then once per second) andare green in color. The indicator lights 825 may indicate that the VPU20 is operating normally when the one or more indicator lights 825 areblinking once per second and are green in color. The indicator lights825 may indicate that the retinal stimulation system 1 has a problemthat was detected by the VPU 20 at start-up diagnostic when the one ormore indicator lights 825 are blinking for example once per five secondand are green in color. The indicator lights 825 may indicate that thevideo signal from camera 12 is not being received by the VPU 20 when theone or more indicator lights 825 are always on and are amber color. Theindicator lights 825 may indicate that there is a loss of communicationbetween the retinal stimulation system 1 and the external coil 14 due tothe movement or removal of Glasses 5 while the system is operational orif the VPU 20 detects a problem with the retinal stimulation system 1and shuts off power to the retinal stimulation system 1 when the one ormore indicator lights 825 are always on and are orange color. Oneskilled in the art would appreciate that other colors and blinkingpatterns can be used to give visual indication of operating status ofthe system without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.

In one embodiment, a single short beep from the speaker (not shown) maybe used to indicate that one of the buttons 825, 805 or 810 have beenpressed. A single beep followed by two more beeps from the speaker (notshown) may be used to indicate that VPU 20 is turned off. Two beeps fromthe speaker (not shown) may be used to indicate that VPU 20 is startingup. Three beeps from the speaker (not shown) may be used to indicatethat an error has occurred and the VPU 20 is about to shut downautomatically. As would be clear to one skilled in the are differentperiodic beeping may also be used to indicate a low battery voltagewarning, that there is a problem with the video signal, and/or there isa loss of communication between the retinal stimulation system 1 and theexternal coil 14. One skilled in the art would appreciate that othersounds can be used to give audio indication of operating status of thesystem without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Forexample, the beeps may be replaced by an actual prerecorded voiceindicating operating status of the system.

In one exemplary embodiment, the VPU 20 is in constant communicationwith the retinal stimulation system 1 through forward and backwardtelemetry. In this document, the forward telemetry refers totransmission from VPU 20 to the retinal stimulation system 1 and thebackward telemetry refers to transmissions from the Retinal stimulationsystem 1 to the VPU 20. During the initial setup, the VPU 20 maytransmit null frames (containing no stimulation information) until theVPU 20 synchronizes with the Retinal stimulation system 1 via the backtelemetry. In one embodiment, an audio alarm may be used to indicatewhenever the synchronization has been lost.

In order to supply power and data to the Retinal stimulation system 1,the VPU 20 may drive the external coil 14 with a 3 MHz signal. Toprotect the subject, the retinal stimulation system 1 may comprise afailure detection circuit to detect direct current leakage and to notifythe VPU 20 through back telemetry so that the visual prosthesisapparatus can be shut down.

One exemplary embodiment of the VPU 20 is shown in FIG. 13. The VPU 20may comprise: a Power Supply, a Distribution and Monitoring Circuit(PSDM) 1005, a Reset Circuit 1010, a System Main Clock (SMC) source (notshown), a Video Preprocessor Clock (VPC) source (not shown), a DigitalSignal Processor (DSP) 1020, Video Preprocessor Data Interface 1025, aVideo Preprocessor 1075, an I²C Protocol Controller 1030, a ComplexProgrammable Logic device (CPLD) (not shown), a Forward TelemetryController (FTC) 1035, a Back Telemetry Controller (BTC) 1040,Input/Output Ports 1045, Memory Devices like a Parallel Flash Memory(PFM) 1050 and a Serial Flash Memory (SFM) 1055, a Real Time Clock 1060,an RF Voltage and Current Monitoring Circuit (VIMC) (not shown), aspeaker and/or a buzzer, an RF receiver 1065, and an RF transmitter1070.

The Power Supply, Distribution and Monitoring Circuit (PSDM) 1005 mayregulate a variable battery voltage to several stable voltages thatapply to components of the VPU 20. The Power Supply, Distribution andMotoring Circuit (PSDM) 1005 may also provide low battery monitoring anddepleted battery system cutoff. The Reset Circuit 1010 may have resetinputs 1011 that are able to invoke system level rest. For example, thereset inputs 1011 may be from a manual push-button reset, a watchdogtimer expiration, and/or firmware based shutdown. The System Main Clock(SMC) source is a clock source for DSP 1020 and CPLD. The VideoPreprocessor Clock (VPC) source is a clock source for the VideoProcessor. The DSP 1020 may act as the central processing unit of theVPU 20. The DSP 1020 may communicate with the rest of the components ofthe VPU 20 through parallel and serial interfaces. The Video Processor1075 may convert the NTSC signal from the camera 12 into a down-scaledresolution digital image format. The Video Processor 1075 may comprise avideo decoder (not shown) for converting the NTSC signal intohigh-resolution digitized image and a video scaler (not shown) forscaling down the high-resolution digitized image from the video decoderto an intermediate digitized image resolution. The video decoder may becomposed of an Analog Input Processing, Chrominance and LuminanceProcessing and Brightness Contrast and Saturation (BSC) Controlcircuits. The video scaler may be composed of Acquisition control,Pre-scaler, BSC-control, Line Buffer and Output Interface. The I²CProtocol Controller 1030 may serve as a link between the DSP 1020 andthe I²C bus. The I²C Protocol Controller 1030 may be able to convert theparallel bus interface of the DSP 1020 to the I²C protocol bus or viseversa. The I²C Protocol Controller 1030 may also be connected to theVideo Processor 1075 and the Real Time Clock 1060. The VPDI 1025 maycontain a tri-state machine to shift video data from Video Preprocessor1075 to the DSP 1020. The Forward Telemetry Controller (FTC) 1035 packs1024 bits of forward telemetry data into a forward telemetry frame. TheFTC 1035 retrieves the forward telemetry data from the DSP 1020 andconverts the data from logic level to biphase marked data. The BackTelemetry Controller (BTC) 1040 retrieves the biphase marked data fromthe RF receiver 1065, decodes it, and generates the BFSR and BCLKR forthe DSP 1020. The Input/Output Ports 1045 provide expanded 10 functionsto access the CPLD on-chip and off-chip devices. The Parallel FlashMemory (PFM) 1050 may be used to store executable code and the SerialFlash Memory (SFM) 1055 may provide Serial Port Interface (SPI) for datastorage. The VIMC may be used to sample and monitor RF transmitter 1070current and voltage in order to monitor the integrity status of theretinal stimulation system 1.

It is known that neurons respond best to change in stimuli. The retina,if continuously stimulated in a consistent manner, will slowly becomeless and less sensitive to the stimulus. This causes the perception of aconstant visual image to gradually disappear. Those with normal visionare unable to perceive this effect because the eye constantly movesthrough motions called jitter or microsaccades. A normal retina has aresolution of approximately four million light transducer cells (rodsand cones), hence it requires a minute movement to change the lightintensity cast upon a given light transducer.

Known retinal prostheses have two disadvantages. First, the resolutionof an electrode array applied to the retina of known prostheses issignificantly lower than the resolution of a healthy retina, thusrequiring a greater movement of the eye to move an image from oneelectrode to the next electrode, as compared to one cone to the nextcone. Second, a head mounted camera of a known prosthesis does not havethe natural jitter or microsaccades of an actual eye. Thesedisadvantages may be overcome by introducing jitter at the level of theimage (captured by the camera 12), or introduce jitter at the level ofthe stimulation pulses (in a spatio-temporal fashion).

It is also known that some neural processing is done within the retina.Hence, a continuously stimulated cone will not result in a continuoussignal to the brain. Ganglion and bipolar cells pass along this changein information more readily than constant information. In a diseasedretina, rods and cones cannot be stimulated, since they are dead.Electrically stimulating cells further along the neural pathway,bypasses some of the neural processing. This neural processing may besimulated electronically to gain normal brain stimulation. In oneexemplary embodiment, the neural processing may be implement with customimage processing algorithms motivated by retinal processing, like theDifference of Gaussian filter that may be use in the VPU 20's firmwareto pre-process the image.

□

When implanting the electrode array 2 of the Retinal stimulation system1, it may be best to implant the electrode array 2 close to the retinawithout crushing it. To make sure that the electrode array 2 is at leastin contact with the retina, it is possible to measure the impedance ofthe electrodes as the electrode array 2 is being implanted into thepatient's eye. Saline vitreous of the eye is more conductive thanretinal tissue. Therefore, high impedance in the electrodes of theelectrode array 2 means good retinal tissue contact and that requiresless electrical stimulation of the retina to create the perception of apixel of light in the subject's eye. However, low impedance in theelectrodes of the electrode array 2 means poor retinal tissue contactand that requires more electrical stimulation of the retina to createthe perception of a pixel of light in the subject's eye. In oneexemplary embodiment, the electrical stimulation of the retina to createthe perception of a pixel of light in the subject's eye may be performedby applying less current to electrodes in the electrodes of the array 2of FIG. 2 that have higher impedance (i.e. the electrodes are contactingthe retina). Applying less current to the electrodes may result inbetter focal percepts, may effectively increase the dynamic range ifpercepts are generated at low currents, may result in longer lifetime ofthe electrodes, and less damage to the tissue underneath the electrodes.

In one embodiment, the graphical user interface of the Fitting System(FS) shown in FIG. 9 may be used to determine the impedance of eachelectrode in the electrode array 2 of FIG. 2 after the electrode array 2has been implanted in the subject's eye.

The graphical user interface of the Fitting System shown in FIG. 9 mayhave six options on the FS Main Menu 1207 as shown in FIG. 14. Forexample, Subject Testing, Transfer Session, Archive Sessions, LoadSecurity File, Maintenance, and Exit.

The Subject Testing option may be selected when performing: diagnosticcheck (i.e. impedance and waveforms) on the status of the implant,viewing waveforms for selected electrodes, loading a video configurationfile to the VPU 20 and stimulating the subject using the downloadedvideo stimulation parameters, executing psychophysical experiments. TheTransfer Session option may be selected when copying file(s) to a thumbdrive. The Archive Sessions option may be selected when archiving alldata files on the FS laptop 10 of FIG. 9 to the external drive 49 ofFIG. 9. The Load Security File option may be selected to enable use ofthe Fitting System. The Load Security File option may be chosen at theinitial clinical testing session. The Maintenance option may be selectedto perform maintenance on one or more components of the system. TheMaintenance option may be set up to only be accessed by an authorizedperson. The Exit option may be selected to close out the main menu.

The Subject Testing option is more fully described in the followingparagraphs.

Prior to using the Subject Testing option, the VPU 20 shown in FIGS.11-12 should be on, the subject should put on the visor/Glasses 5, theGlasses 5 should be adjusted until a link is obtained with the implant,and the VPU 20 should confirm that the implant is working by runningstart-up tests.

Once the Subject Testing option is selected from window 1207, a loginscreen 1208 shown in FIG. 15 may be displayed with fields for User ID,Password and Subject ID. After the login, a diagnostic application maybe initiated to display the status of the implant. Through thediagnostic application, an electrode integrity check may be performedand the electrode status may be displayed and the impedance andwaveforms for each of the electrodes can be measured.

An “Electrode Integrity” message box 1206, shown in FIG. 16, may bedisplayed in the event that any newly broken/shorted electrodes aredetected or broken/shorted electrodes are present. If no newly detectedbroken/shorted electrodes are detected, this message box will not appearand the diagnostics screen 1209 shown in FIG. 17 may be displayed.

The Diagnostic Module Screen 1209 shown in FIG. 17 may contain: 1)Session Information 1201 displaying (a) Experimenter (User) ID, (b)Subject ID, (c) VPU Connection identifying the status of the connectionof the VPU 20 to the FS, (d) Implant Connection identifying the statusof the connection of the implant to the FS, and (e) Stimulationidentifying the status of stimulation (i.e., whether or not stimulationis occurring); 2) Measure Impedance 1203 for measuring impedance for theelectrodes; 3) Measure All Waveforms 1204 for measuring waveforms forthe electrodes; 4) Broken Electrodes/Impedance (in kOhms)—6×10 ElectrodeGrid 1205 representing each of the implant electrodes. The view of theelectrodes is from the perspective of the subject. The electrodes shownas “{circle around (x)}” are designated as broken/shorted or aredesignated as being deselected from being tested. When measuringimpedance, the values will appear directly under each representedelectrode. Stimulation should not occur on electrodes designated asbroken; and 5) Impedance Scale 1202 for impedance that ranges from 0 to45 kOhms.

Clicking on the Measure Impedance 1203 of FIG. 17 will measure impedanceof the electrodes and a message box shown in FIG. 18 may be used toindicate the progress of obtaining impedance measurements. Once theimpedance measurements are completed, the impedance values (in kOhms)will be displayed as shown in FIG. 19 under each represented electrode.Each of the electrodes may be color coded based on where the impedancevalue falls within the impedance scale from 0 to 45 kOhms of theImpedance Scale 1202. The impedance values for the subject may beautomatically stored in a file marked for transfer on the FS laptop 10.

In one exemplary embodiment, it may be advantageous to provide a surgeonwith real time impedance information about the electrodes in theelectrode array 2 of FIG. 2 during surgery to aid the surgeon in placingthe electrode array 2 close to the retina without crushing it.

In one embodiment, the Diagnostic Module Screen 1209 shown in FIG. 17may be used to determine the impedance of each electrode in theelectrode array 2 while the electrode array 2 is being implanted in thesubject's eye. The retinal stimulation system 1 of FIG. 2 providesbidirectional data through an RF link between the external coil 14 andinternal coil 116. During the surgery, stimulation information may beprovided to the retinal stimulation system 1 of FIG. 2 and telemetryincluding voltage drop, from which impedance is calculated, is sentback. Impedance measurement may be conducted with sub-thresholdstimulation current. A sub-threshold stimulation is a current that istoo small to create a percept. The sub-threshold stimulation current maystill return a voltage drop measurement that can be used to calculateimpedance using Ohm's law: R=voltage drop/stimulation current.

After the impedance of electrodes in the electrode array 2 of FIG. 2 hasbeen measured, the physician/surgeon can quickly scan the DiagnosticModule Screen 1209 of FIG. 17 to assess the placement or any areas thatare working better than others. This allows the surgeon to quicklyassess multiple locations. To fine tune the location, it may beadvantageous to measure impedance at multiple frequencies. This may beactivated by a “measure all waveforms” button 1204, also shown in FIG.17.

To measure waveforms, Clicking on “Measure All Waveforms” 1204 willmeasure waveforms of the electrodes. Once the measurements are complete,the waveform information may be stored in a file marked for transfer onthe FS laptop 10. The waveforms for each of the electrodes can be viewedfrom the Waveform Viewer 1217 shown in FIG. 20.

The Waveform Viewer 1217 shown in FIG. 20 is a utility that may be usedto measure and view the waveform of a selected electrode. From the listof the electrodes at the bottom of the screen (displayed in a 6×10configuration 1230 with their Cartesian coordinates), a specificelectrode for which to measure the waveform may be selected. Uponselection of the electrode, the VPU 20 will record the waveform and theinformation will be sent to the FS so that the waveform data may bepresented on the screen as shown in FIG. 21 in which, for example, thewaveform of electrode A03 is measured during stimulation. Byright-clicking on the mouse, it may be possible to zoom in and zoom outon the displayed waveform. The waveform may be saved by clicking on the“Save Waveform” button 1231.

The impedance measurement may be continuous or activated manually by ameasure impedance button 1203, see FIG. 17, as already discussed before.FIG. 22 is a flow chart of an embodiment of the testing procedure.Referring to FIG. 22, the testing software first determines if theimpedance measurement is to be done continuously (output “Continuous” ofstep 1250) or is to be done manually (output “Manual” of step 1250). Incontinuous mode, the software may continuously test a timer (not shown)for the next testing event. “Continuous” may mean that the timer istested at a set time interval, for example, every millisecond. If it istime for the next test (output “Yes” of step 1252), the softwareproceeds to step 1256. If it is not time for the next test (output “No”of step 1252), the software continues to test the timer. In manual□mode,the software tests for depression of test button 1203. If test button1203 is not depressed (output “No” of step 1254), the software continuesto wait. If test button 1203 is depressed (output “Yes” of step 1254),the software proceeds to step 1256.

First, the electrode counter “E” is set to 0 in step 1256, andincremented by one in step 1258. The electrode with the numbercorresponding to the value of the counter “E” is stimulated in step 1260with, for example, a sub-threshold stimulation pulse. The voltage valueV_(E) (or voltage difference corresponding to V_(E)) is measured in step1262 and the value V_(E) is returned, for example, to the VPU 20 in step1264. If the value of the counter “E” is not equal to the total numberof electrodes (output “No” of step 1266), the process is repeated untilthe condition E=T is reached, meaning that all electrodes have beenmeasured. Upon measuring all electrodes (output “Yes” of step 1266), thesoftware returns to check the mode in step 1250.

As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singularforms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the contentclearly dictates otherwise. The term “plurality” includes two or morereferents unless the content clearly dictates otherwise. Unless definedotherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the samemeaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art towhich the disclosure pertains.

Accordingly, what has been shown is an improved visual prosthesis,improved method of stimulating a subject's retina and an improved methodfor implanting electrodes in a subject's retina. While the invention hasbeen described by means of specific embodiments and applicationsthereof, it is understood that numerous modifications and variationscould be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing fromthe spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore to be understoodthat within the scope of the claims, the invention may be practicedotherwise than as specifically described herein. Although the abovedisclosure pertains to visual prosthesis and a subject's eye, it shouldalso be understood that this disclosure may also pertain to other areas,like, for example, semiconductors.

1. A method to provide visual current feedback of a retinal stimulationsystem, the method comprising: providing a retinal stimulation systemconfigured to stimulate neural tissue in a subject's eye, the retinalstimulation system comprising: an electronics package; and at least afirst and a second electrode, each associated with the electronicspackage and configured to apply current to a subject's retina; whereincurrent to be applied by the first electrode and the second electrode isconfigured to be higher for the first electrode when the first electrodehas an impedance lower than a second electrode's impedance; andproviding a visual interface configured to show impedance of at leastone of the electrodes.
 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the at leastfirst and second electrode are part of an array of electrodes.
 3. Themethod of claim 2, wherein the array of electrodes is an array of 6×10electrodes.
 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the visual interface isconfigured to determine impedance for the at least first electrode andsecond electrode by: applying current through the first electrode andsecond electrode; determining voltage drop across the first electrodeand second electrode; and calculating impedance of the first electrodeand second electrode based on the voltage drop across the firstelectrode and second electrode.
 5. The method of claim 4, wherein thecurrent being applied to the electrodes when determining impedance ofthe electrodes is below a threshold current required to createperception of light by the subject.
 6. The method of claim 4, whereindetermining impedance of the electrodes is performed continuously ormanually.
 7. A method for providing visual current feedback whenimplanting electrodes in a subject's retina, the method comprising: a)temporarily placing electrodes in a subject's retina; b) determiningimpedance of the placed electrodes; c) monitoring impedance of at leastone of the electrodes using a visual interface; d) repeating features a)and c) until impedance of the electrodes is ideal for permanentimplanting of the electrodes.
 8. The method of claim 7, wherein theelectrodes are part of an array of electrodes.
 9. The method of claim 8,wherein the array of electrodes is an array of 6×10 electrodes.
 10. Themethod of claim 7, wherein determining impedance of the electrodescomprises: applying current through the electrodes; determining voltagedrop across each of the electrodes; and calculating impedance of eachelectrode based on the voltage drop across each electrode.
 11. Themethod of claim 10, wherein the current applied to the electrodes whendetermining the impedance of the electrodes is below a threshold currentrequired to create perception of light by the subject.
 12. Acomputer-operated system comprising a display component, the displaycomponent having a graphical user interface associated with the methodfor implanting electrodes in a subject's retina, the method comprising:a) placing electrodes in a subject's retina; b) determining impedance ofthe placed electrodes; c) repeating features a) and b) until impedanceof the electrodes is ideal for implanting of the electrodes; and thegraphical user interface comprising: a diagnostic module screen; and ameasure impedance button.
 13. The computer-operated system of claim 12,wherein the electrodes are part of an array of electrodes.
 14. Thecomputer-operated system of claim 13, wherein the array of electrodes isan array of 6×10 electrodes.
 15. A computer implemented method fortesting impedance of electrodes, the method comprising: a) setting acounter to an initial value; b) incrementing the value of the counter;c) stimulating an electrode that corresponds to the value of thecounter; d) measuring a voltage drop across the stimulated electrode;and e) repeating features b) through d) until the value of the counterreflects the total number of electrodes being tested.
 16. The computerimplemented method of claim 15, further comprising: f) repeatingfeatures a) through e) in case the impedance testing of the electrodesis continuous.
 17. The computer implemented method of claim 15, furthercomprising: f) repeating features a) through e) upon request of a user.18. The computer implemented method of claim 15, wherein the value ofthe counter is incremented by one.
 19. A method to provide visualcurrent feedback when determining which electrode is to be in contactwith a subject's retina, the method comprising: applying current to aplurality of electrodes implanted in the subject's eye; determiningimpedance of each electrode of the plurality of electrodes; providing avisual interface configured to show impedance of at least one of theelectrodes; and establishing the electrode with the highest impedance asthe electrode in contact with the subject's retina.
 20. The method ofclaim 19, wherein the plurality electrode are part of an array ofelectrodes.
 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the array of electrodesis an array of 6×10 electrodes.
 22. The method of claim 19, whereindetermining impedance of each electrode comprises: determining voltagedrop across each of the electrodes; and calculating impedance of eachelectrode based on the voltage drop across each electrode.
 23. Themethod of claim 19, wherein the current being applied to the electrodesis below a threshold current required to create perception of light bythe subject.